Sparse head-to-head centrality

NCAA XC Power Ranker

Drop the same TFRRS-style results CSVs you have been using. Everything runs in this browser.

Drop results CSVs hereor choose one or more files · no upload leaves this page

Built-in seasonLoads race results, plus track marks and rosters when available.

Remember these CSVs on this deviceFiles stay local to this browser.

Division

Historical alignment 1× · Normal

Choose results to begin.

Outcome range

Monte Carlo team outlook

This is a range, not a verdict: all seven field runners are simulated, then the best five after the simulated race score. A runner ranked sixth or seventh in the central estimate can therefore have a good day and count.

Conditional on the displayed field

Rank	Team	Mean five-score points	Win	Top 4	Top 10

Field and rankings

National power layer

Step 1: race-only relative ability. Step 2: historical alignment and unraced athletes.

Single-run team order

The central estimate from the second-stage athlete order. Every field runner displaces; each scoring team totals its first five.

Rank	Team	Expected points	Field runners

Individual field

Use this table for the underlying evidence—not as a separate team forecast.

Final	Tier	Athlete	Team	Path	Stage 2	Confidence	Races